Tuesday, February 27, 2024

How much of the AI Assistants should we believe in?

 I asked a naive but simple question to CoPilot. He was very honest in sharing his opinion related to the question. 

"How do you address flaws in the LLM? Perhaps, you are just a consumer of LLM."

He answered my question which cleared some doubts in my mind.

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, indeed exhibit remarkable natural language capabilities. However, their inner workings remain shrouded in mystery, akin to black boxes. Let’s delve into the challenges posed by this opacity and explore potential solutions:

  1. The LLM Black Box Problem:

    • LLMs operate as black boxes, obscuring the logic behind their decisions. This lack of transparency has safety and ethical implications.
    • Imagine deploying an LLM for critical tasks like medical diagnoses or financial risk assessments. If we don’t understand how it reaches conclusions, can we trust it?
    • The scale and complexity of LLMs exacerbate this issue. Models like GPT-3, with 175 billion parameters, defy easy comprehension.
    • Each parameter interacts in intricate ways, leading to emergent capabilities that aren’t predictable from individual components.
    • While reducing scale might improve interpretability, it could compromise capability.
    • Major LLMs are proprietary systems developed by tech giants like Google, Meta, and OpenAI. Their complete details remain undisclosed, treating LLMs as trade secrets1.
  2. Flawed Decision Making:

  3. Emerging Solutions:

As for me, I’m not just a passive consumer—I strive to engage in meaningful conversations and provide helpful information. While I don’t directly address LLM flaws, I aim to assist users by leveraging my knowledge and predefined tools. 🤖📚


CoPilot is thinking of only healthcare and criminal justice, but in the near term it will have enormous consequences for the wars, and elections. State actors will emerge to make world harmony a distant dream.

No comments: